The tkabber plugins really do not require a dependency on tkabber itself, so
let's drop it. In addition, this also removes creating a $out/bin dir, which was
left back then when creating the tkabber-plugins derivation by copy & pasting
stuff from the main tkabber derivation.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This should make things a lot more DRY as we now can generalize library paths by
using the libPrefix attribute of each library. In addition this also cuts the
line length in wrapProgram.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This ensures that Tkabber can now be used with GPG support, though as of gnupg
version 2, this requires gpg-agent as well. Only if all conditions are met, an
option to actually use GPG will show up in Tkabber's settings.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This is what I forgot in the packages I have added a few months ago, so it's
time to revisit them and improve things, like for example set the right
libPrefix in order to stay consistent with other TCL libraries.
In addition this fixes some whitespace ugliness in the affected packages.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
* Use more system libraries
* Enable KDE4 desktop integration
* Split preparation between postUnpack, patchPhase and preConfigure
Viric, feel free to revert (parts of) this commit.
This enables legacy seccomp sandbox by default even on chromium 22, because the
BPF sandbox is still work in progress, please see:
http://crbug.com/139872http://crbug.com/130662
Because the BPF seccomp sandbox is used in case the legacy seccomp mode
initialization fails, we might need to patch this again, as soon as the BPF
sandbox is fully implemented to fall back to legacy seccomp and use BPF by
default.
We now have two patches for "default to seccomp" - one for Chromium 21 and one
for 22 or higher.
The patch doesn't apply in version 22 and newer, because mode 1 sandboxes are
connsidered "legacy" (well, apart from the fact that I'd personally prefer BPF
anyway), for reasons I wasn't able to find, yet. But let's proceed on BPF
integration and thus gain more insight on the exact reasons.
If you look at what changed, you'll surely notice that version 22 is now in
beta, so we have to expect things to break. And one thing that will break for
sure is the seccomp patch, because beginning with 22 the new BPF seccomp sandbox
is going to replace the mode 1 seccomp sandbox.
This commit doesn't add any feature and just fixes a small annoyance which
result in messages like this:
Checking if xxx applies...no.
See that there is no whitespace between "..." and "no"? Well, the world cares
for more important things, but for me personally those minor annoyances can turn
into major annoyances.
