Announced in [1], versioned tarballs allow to make sure that a
specific version is fetched. This does not guarantee that all previous
versions are retained on the main mirrors.
Logically, we would want to first try to download versioned tarballs
from any mirror and only then try the unversioned ones. But right now
we only have two mirrors and only some of the tarballs are versioned
in texlive-2019, so the order is changed to not hammer the weak
tug.org mirror.
[1] https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2019-September/044086.html
The biber package is now at 2.14, but TextBibTeX is still required.
Few changes were needed for newly introduced scripts-extra path. This
broke some of our old tricks which were relying on having writable
script directories. The changes to the script locations made buildEnv
create symlinks to the script directories instead of directories of
symlinks to scripts. The changes to texlinks.sh and texlive/TeXLive
perl path were made because of this.
biber: 2.12 -> 2.13
Vendored potrace was moved from libs/potrace to
texk/dvisvgm/dvisvgm-src/libs/potrace. Unfortunately, it is not trivial
to remove it from there, so for now dvisvgm seems to be using its
vendored dependencies.
This commit rebuilds texlive 2017 with the final release of 2017. As described
in these issues [1][2][3], the upstream CTAN mirrors are a continuously moving
rolling release without historical archives.
This particular FTP server is also a rolling release folling CTAN for the latest
version, but it has snapshots of the final texlive releases; it appears that the
2017 distribution has been unmodified since texlive-2018 was released earlier
this year.
Along the way, we needed to fix several issues:
- xindy: if $HOME is unset, it will try to mkdir /homeless-shelter, which fails
due to insufficient permissions.
- scheme-infraonly: this scheme had symlinks into other releases that were
read-only, so it couldn't patch and modify the scripts. This commit removes it
for now, but that's not a particularly satisfying solution. Ideas?
This also adds some documentation on the upgrade process to prepare for
texlive-2018 [4].
This commit also replaces the sha1 hashes with upstream's standard sha512 hashes.
It appears the motivation for the shorter hashes was to save disk space in the
derivations; in master, the size of this directory is 1012K; in this commit it
is 1600K. The difference is not particularly large, and the downsides to using
our own sha1 hashes are:
- More nix code to maintain
- Multi-step upgrade process for maintainers: the maintainer first has to
download all upstream tarballs by sha512 hash, then run the fix script, then
rebuild with sha1 hashes.
- Less transparent. If we use the upstream sha512 hashes, any user can
immediately verify that the hashes we're providing match upstream, or match
the snapshot in time.
- Easier to debug. Since upstream is rolling and packages may disappear or fail
to build, it's useful to be able to determine if the sha mismatch is because
of an update or not; if we have a sha1 mismatch and no tarball to pull, we
can't figure out which sha512sum would have produced that sha1.
- Less trust required. Due to the above, users don't have to trust the
content-addressed mirrors on IPFS and @veprbl's servers as much.
- Easier to cobble together a source distribution from a variety of sources. It
seems some FTP servers have more/less than others, or older/newer packages. If
we know what we're looking for beforehand and we're just missing a few
packages whose hashes match the advertised hashes upstream, it's easier to find.
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/24683
[2] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/10026
[3] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/34490
[4] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/40232
Hashes added manually, not using `fixHashes.sh`.
We remove xdvi from collection-basic and put it elsewhere:
previously this was collection-genericextra but that no longer
exist so I suppose it can go in collection-plainextra.
(As mentioned on the issue, might be best to just leave it in basic?)
Fixes#32661.
fmtutil has started to report number of failed formats in its return code. One
could regenerate the share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf to only include available
.ini files, but simpler solution is to ignore the return code.
This was one of the ways to build packages, we are trying
hard to minimize different ways so it's easier for newcomers
to learn only one way.
This also:
- removes texLive (old), fixes#14807
- removed upstream-updater, if that code is still used it should be in
separate repo
- changes a few packages like gitit/mit-scheme to use new texlive
- there were many easy merge conflicts
- cc-wrapper needed nontrivial changes
Many other problems might've been created by interaction of the branches,
but stdenv and a few other packages build fine now.
Pavol Rusnak