nixpkgs/pkgs/development/libraries/haskell/zlib/0.5.3.3.nix

{ cabal, zlib }:

cabal.mkDerivation (self: {
  pname = "zlib";
  version = "0.5.3.3";
  sha256 = "1hrq34w9y8m7nahvrdpnkh9rdb4jycpcpv9ix6qrxijvbz2vdbg2";
  extraLibraries = [ zlib ];
  meta = {
    description = "Compression and decompression in the gzip and zlib formats";
    license = self.stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;
    platforms = self.ghc.meta.platforms;
    maintainers = [ self.stdenv.lib.maintainers.andres ];
  };
})
Re-generated Haskell package descriptions with the latest version of cabal2nix. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=32327 2012-02-16 15:05:41 +01:00			`{ cabal, zlib }:`
haskell-zlib: added version 0.5.3.3 svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=32101 2012-02-07 11:34:28 +01:00
			`cabal.mkDerivation (self: {`
			`pname = "zlib";`
			`version = "0.5.3.3";`
			`sha256 = "1hrq34w9y8m7nahvrdpnkh9rdb4jycpcpv9ix6qrxijvbz2vdbg2";`
			`extraLibraries = [ zlib ];`
			`meta = {`
			`description = "Compression and decompression in the gzip and zlib formats";`
			`license = self.stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;`
			`platforms = self.ghc.meta.platforms;`
Removed myself as a maintainer from Haskell packages that I don't personally use. By now, it happened twice that a commit broke GHC and thus all Haskell packages we have in Nixpkgs. On such an occasion, I receive well in excess of 3000 notification e-mails from Hydra, and then I receive another 3000 e-mails after the bug has been fixed. Under these circumstances, subscribing to these notifications makes no sense for me. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=33392 2012-03-24 11:21:28 +01:00			`maintainers = [ self.stdenv.lib.maintainers.andres ];`
haskell-zlib: added version 0.5.3.3 svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=32101 2012-02-07 11:34:28 +01:00			`};`
			`})`